fix(solidity-devops): always add verifier options to forge script
#3254
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
javascript
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the handling of verification options during the deployment process in the Solidity DevOps package. A new method, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Deploying sanguine-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
ae25d0c
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://9a6a9d8f.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://fix-solidity-devops-verifier.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/solidity-devops/js/utils/options.js (2)
31-33: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc for clarity.The function rename to
addVerifyIfNotPresentis a good improvement as it better describes the function's behavior. The logic is correct and unchanged.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to improve the function's documentation:
/** * Adds the '--verify' option to the options string if it's not already present. * @param {string} options - The current options string. * @returns {string} The options string with '--verify' added if it wasn't present. */ const addVerifyIfNotPresent = (options) => { return options.includes('--verify') ? options : `${options} --verify` }
Potential Inconsistency Found:
addVerifyIfNotPresentis used in additional files outsideoptions.js. Please ensure all usages are updated accordingly.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
31-42: Summary: Good refactoring, consider impact on dependent code.The changes in this file are minimal but improve code clarity. The function rename from
addVerifyOptionstoaddVerifyIfNotPresentbetter describes its behavior. However, this change might affect other parts of the codebase that use this function.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of 'addVerifyOptions' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'addVerifyOptions'. Expect: No results, as it should have been renamed everywhere. rg --type js 'addVerifyOptions' # Test: Search for 'addVerifyIfNotPresent' to confirm its usage. Expect: At least one result in this file. rg --type js 'addVerifyIfNotPresent'Length of output: 398
packages/solidity-devops/js/forgeScriptRun.js (2)
6-6: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.The addition of
readChainVerificationOptionsis appropriate for the PR's objective. To improve code organization, consider grouping related imports together.You could group
readChainVerificationOptionswithreadChainSpecificOptionssince they are related to chain options:const { readChainSpecificOptions, readChainVerificationOptions, // ... other imports } = require('./utils/chain.js')
51-55: LGTM! Consider combining the operations for efficiency.The new logic for handling verification options is well-structured and aligns perfectly with the PR's objective. It ensures that chain-specific verification options are considered and added consistently.
For a slight optimization, you could combine the two operations:
if (isBroadcast && isVerifierEnabled(chainName)) { forgeOptions = addVerifyIfNotPresent( addOptions(forgeOptions, readChainVerificationOptions(chainName)) ) }This reduces the number of function calls and makes the code slightly more concise.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/solidity-devops/js/forgeScriptRun.js (3 hunks)
- packages/solidity-devops/js/utils/options.js (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/solidity-devops/js/utils/options.js (1)
42-42: LGTM! Export updated correctly.The module export has been correctly updated to reflect the function rename from
addVerifyOptionstoaddVerifyIfNotPresent. This change maintains consistency with the function rename and preserves the module's interface.packages/solidity-devops/js/forgeScriptRun.js (1)
22-22: Approve the function name change. Verify the new function's implementation.The replacement of
addVerifyOptionswithaddVerifyIfNotPresentimproves clarity and suggests a more careful approach to adding verification options. This change aligns well with the PR's objective.To ensure the new function behaves as expected, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
To proceed with the verification, please run the following scripts:
To further verify the implementation of
addVerifyIfNotPresent, please run the following scripts:
Verified the implementation of
addVerifyIfNotPresent.The function
addVerifyIfNotPresentis correctly implemented as an arrow function inutils/options.jsand is used appropriately across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of addVerifyIfNotPresent function # Test: Check the implementation of addVerifyIfNotPresent ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'function addVerifyIfNotPresent($_) { $$$ }' # Test: Verify usage of addVerifyIfNotPresent in other files rg --type javascript 'addVerifyIfNotPresent'Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of addVerifyIfNotPresent function # Test: Check the implementation of addVerifyIfNotPresent ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'function addVerifyIfNotPresent($_) { $$$ }' # Test: Verify usage of addVerifyIfNotPresent in other files with correct file type rg --type js 'addVerifyIfNotPresent'Length of output: 452
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of addVerifyIfNotPresent function as an arrow function # Test: Check the implementation of addVerifyIfNotPresent as a constant arrow function ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'const addVerifyIfNotPresent = ($_ ) => { $$$ }' # Test: Verify usage of addVerifyIfNotPresent in other files with correct file type rg --type js 'addVerifyIfNotPresent'Length of output: 719
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3254 +/- ##
===================================================
- Coverage 93.10658% 90.43902% -2.66756%
===================================================
Files 89 54 -35
Lines 2205 1025 -1180
Branches 278 82 -196
===================================================
- Hits 2053 927 -1126
+ Misses 143 95 -48
+ Partials 9 3 -6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ChiTimesChi
force-pushed
the
fix/solidity-devops-verifier-options
branch
from
989fc5b to
bd792ea
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/solidity-devops/test/GasBenchmark.t.sol (2)
1-10: Consider clarifying the purpose of this fileThe file structure is correct, and it follows Solidity best practices. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between the file name "GasBenchmark.t.sol" and the comment indicating that no gas benchmark is required. This might lead to confusion for other developers.
Consider one of the following options:
- Rename the file to better reflect its current purpose (e.g., "NoGasBenchmark.t.sol").
- If gas benchmarking is planned for the future, add a TODO comment explaining when and why it will be implemented.
- If this file is a placeholder, consider adding more context in the comments about why it exists in its current form.
8-9: Empty test function might need justificationThe
testGasBenchmarkfunction is intentionally left empty, which is fine given the context. However, it might be helpful to provide more information about why this empty test exists.Consider adding a brief comment inside the function to explain its purpose, for example:
function testGasBenchmark() public { // This function is intentionally left empty as no gas benchmark // is required for solidity-devops. It serves as a placeholder for // potential future benchmarking needs. }This would provide more context for other developers who might come across this file in the future.
Description
A clear and concise description of the features you're adding in this pull request.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem you're solving.
Metadata
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor