You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I'm currently experimenting with some integrals for implementing GOSTSHYP in pyscf.
For that, I need to build a custom "fakemol" and basis set, so I've been using pyscf's fakemol_for_charges to do the setup. The reason for this is that these special basis functions are not normalized.
Along the way, I've been wondering which integrals libcint actually computes under the hood, so I've tried to "manually" compute the overlap of a primitive s-function with itself, with exponent of one, contraction coefficient of one, centered at the origin.
I was wondering why the result from libcint is not identical to what I get with sympy? What am I forgetting/missing here?
Thanks, the 1/(4pi) did the trick 👍 Regarding 1., I already had a product of two Gaussians, note the ** 2 after the exp function.
I'll leave this issue open for follow-up questions during my implementation if that's okay.
Hi,
I'm currently experimenting with some integrals for implementing GOSTSHYP in
pyscf
.For that, I need to build a custom "fakemol" and basis set, so I've been using pyscf's
fakemol_for_charges
to do the setup. The reason for this is that these special basis functions are not normalized.Along the way, I've been wondering which integrals
libcint
actually computes under the hood, so I've tried to "manually" compute the overlap of a primitive s-function with itself, with exponent of one, contraction coefficient of one, centered at the origin.I was wondering why the result from
libcint
is not identical to what I get withsympy
? What am I forgetting/missing here?Output:
Thanks for helping with this (probably stupid) question 😁
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: