Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: New stryker utility #1457

Closed
tverhoken opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Question: New stryker utility #1457

tverhoken opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
☠ stale Marked as stale by the stale bot, will be removed after a certain time.

Comments

@tverhoken
Copy link

Hello,

I did that utility for Stryker that allow to run stryker only for the diff files between current branch and "origin/master" in order to be able to run mutation testing on branches and pull requests without taking too long for the CI build.

Would it be interesting to include it to the stryker-mutator projects ?

Regards.

@nicojs
Copy link
Member

nicojs commented Mar 26, 2019

@tverhoken that is a cool tool 👍 ! I'll discuss it with @simondel.

In the meantime, feel free to add the tool to the guides segment of the stryker-handbook.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 20, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the ☠ stale Marked as stale by the stale bot, will be removed after a certain time. label Nov 20, 2020
@tverhoken
Copy link
Author

Hi @nicojs ,

I did take a look at Stryker latest versions and I was wondering if the diff runner should stay an utility script alongside Stryker or if it should be a plugin to add that feature to Stryker ?

It seems that plugins are the way to add features to Stryker now.

@stale stale bot removed the ☠ stale Marked as stale by the stale bot, will be removed after a certain time. label Nov 27, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 27, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the ☠ stale Marked as stale by the stale bot, will be removed after a certain time. label Nov 27, 2021
@nicojs
Copy link
Member

nicojs commented Nov 27, 2021

You might be interested in #3229. I think "ignore plugin" would be great for this. Feedback would be much appreciated

@stale stale bot removed the ☠ stale Marked as stale by the stale bot, will be removed after a certain time. label Nov 27, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 28, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the ☠ stale Marked as stale by the stale bot, will be removed after a certain time. label Nov 28, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Dec 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☠ stale Marked as stale by the stale bot, will be removed after a certain time.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants