Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No ability to set BNCS server port #92

Open
Davnit opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

No ability to set BNCS server port #92

Davnit opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@Davnit
Copy link
Member

Davnit commented Feb 14, 2023

Should at the very least make it a config override, if not supporting <hostname>:<port> format for the server field.

Needs to work when connecting via proxy as well.

@Davnit Davnit added the feature label Feb 14, 2023
@dottereldesign
Copy link

Does this work on the currnet battle.net?

@carlbennett
Copy link
Contributor

Does this work on the currnet battle.net?

StealthBot has no option for configuring an alternative port than 6112, which is no problem for current Classic Battle.net™ since it presently uses that port officially. This is an issue for third-party research and development servers that are on a different port for some reason, probably related to NAT port forwarding. In these rare cases, StealthBot is simply unable to connect to those development servers on an alternative port due to code limitations that specify the port as 6112.

Users should not concern themselves with this, the games use 6112 officially, the games also are incapable of switching the port, and servers should therefore be listening on that port, which is where StealthBot connects to since it emulates the games at the protocol level.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants