[FEAT] Advanced support for multi-line

[jvdevlab]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The multi-line support doesn't allow for reach formatting of the answer.

Here is the example of the card I would like to have:

Question?
??
Answer 1

Empty line above

Code Block

More empty lines.

Links to other cards 

The work around I can have right now is to use blockquote

Question?
??
>Answer 1
>
>Empty line above
>
>Code Block
>
>More empty lines.
>
>Links to other cards 

This doesn't make it look nice. I can play with formatting more and don't wrap code block but it would be nice to have better support for multi-line

Describe the solution you'd like

Introduce configurable delimiters for the answer boundaries. By default it could be comments.

Question?
<!--SR:START-->
Answer 1

Empty line above

Code Block

More empty lines.

Links to other cards 

<!--SR:END-->

Thank you.

[ronzulu]

Hi @jvdevlab

Thanks for the suggestion.

There are some related features already requested, please see:

• [FEAT] Support blank lines in multi-line flashcards
• More flexible formatting (especially blank lines) for flashcards

The current functionality supports changing the string that separates the question from the answer. I haven't tried it, but I would think that you would be able to change it to <!--SR:START-->.

Note that #601 has support for blank lines in the question as well as the answer:

^^^
This is the first line of my question.

This is the second line my question.
+++
This is the first line of my answer.

This is the second line of my answer.
vvv

Is there anything that you are after that would not be supported if #601 is implemented?

Cheers
Ronny

[jvdevlab]

Hi @ronzulu,

Thank you for the reply. Any solution that would support blank lines will do.

I feel like comments approach will make it be less prone to conflict with other delimiters used in other notes (plugins) and easier to parse.

I did try the comment as a start delimiter.

## Test questions?
<!--SR:START-->
Test answer

It cuts off the beginning of the question

But as mentioned above any solution will do.
Thanks

[ronzulu]

Hi @jvdevlab glad we have managed to consolidate functionality at #601.

I'll close this off now, but if there is anything else related you think of, feel free to update that issue.

Cheers
Ronny