Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Correct card "reversed" terminology, should be "bidirectional" #876

Open
ronzulu opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@ronzulu
Copy link
Collaborator

ronzulu commented Feb 14, 2024

Describe the bug

In the documentation, there are card types "Single-line Reversed" and "Multi-line Reversed".
https://www.stephenmwangi.com/obsidian-spaced-repetition/flashcards

("Single-line Reversed" is termed slightly differently in the plug-in's settings as "inline reversed")

"Reversed" is inaccurate and led to user issues:


Expected behavior

Synonyms for "bidirectional" are:
https://www.synonym.com/synonyms/bidirectional
image

bifacial - "having two faces or fronts" - not appropriate
duplex - "allowing communication in opposite directions simultaneously" - not appropriate
two-way - valid, but would lead to terms "Single-line two-way" and "Multi-line two-way", which isn't as straightforward as "Single-line bidirectional" and "Multi-line bidirectional"

Change terminology to refer to existing functionality as "bidirectional" rather than "reversed" in:

  • Documentation
  • Plug-in settings
@ronzulu ronzulu added bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Feb 14, 2024
@ronzulu ronzulu changed the title [BUG] Correct card "reversed" terminology, should be "bidirectional" (or similar) [BUG] Correct card "reversed" terminology, should be "bidirectional" Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant