Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Auto arima #53

Open
wants to merge 77 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

josepablocam
Copy link
Contributor

A heuristic to fit arima models automatically. Is meant to be a spark-timeseries counterpart of Hyndman's implementation in forecast

jose.cambronero and others added 30 commits June 12, 2015 11:40
A couple of simple changes to get started: corrected
added EWMA functionality and tests
…evant tests), added missing type to EasyPlot functions
jose.cambronero and others added 24 commits August 10, 2015 14:03
added option to drop intercept in AR(n) model
…clear if correctly implementing that function, added test data
… Sandy's feedback. Modified forecast to take same approach (i.e. use AR of intercept and MA of 0.0 prior to start of series). Added tests and modified leniency on intercept term
…change was breaking up (p, d, q) as separate ARIMAModel members
…ameters, fixed typo in hannan, moved around arguments in functions in ARIMA object for consistency
…cordingly. Added 2 new functions to UnivariateTimeSeries to perform differencing of order-d, rather than differencing at lag-d
…calls to differences of lag, removed unnecessary copying of vector in differences of order
@josepablocam
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sryza This depends on the kpss test. I've included that here (without the small changes made to the kpss patch). If the kpss patch is merged, I'll fix the conflicts here and then merge. Tagging as WIP because of this.

@jkremser
Copy link

@josepablocam any chance this will go in? Was the "kpss patch" merged in?

@josepablocam
Copy link
Contributor Author

josepablocam commented Apr 19, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants