You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Images with greater resolution than 450 for each axis were not used for the training even if a 256x256 resizing was applied before being given to the hourglass network. Regarding the testing, a zero padding was used thus modifying the look and the effectiveness of the hourglass.
In the PR #15 a choice was made to resize every input image using a 256x256 resolution, thus modifying the look of the images to improve generalisation.
Another solution could be to use cropping (center crop, crop based on the spinal cord centerline, ...) but some contexts information could be missing.
This difference will need to be investigated to keep the best solution.
Description
Images with greater resolution than 450 for each axis were not used for the training even if a 256x256 resizing was applied before being given to the hourglass network. Regarding the testing, a zero padding was used thus modifying the look and the effectiveness of the hourglass.
https://github.com/spinalcordtoolbox/disc-labeling-hourglass/blob/main/src/dlh/utils/data2array.py#L259-L272
This issue needs to be handled so the network may be used with different datasets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: