False positive: role-with-double-backticks

[hugovk]

The valid text has :all: at the end of an inline code block (it's a pip option) is reported as invalid.

Small reproducer:

Only by specifying ``--only-binary :all:`` can you ...

#. Install the requirements file using
   ``pip install --require-hashes --no-deps --only-binary :all:``

$ sphinx-lint 1.rst
1.rst:1: role use a single backtick, double backtick found. (role-with-double-backticks)
1.rst:4: role use a single backtick, double backtick found. (role-with-double-backticks)

---

To reproduce on a real-life file:

$ wget --quiet https://raw.githubusercontent.com/python/peps/ebefef14d5df408a4a0f8644a454073338fa41aa/pep-0665.rst
$ sphinx-lint pep-0665.rst
pep-0665.rst:190: role use a single backtick, double backtick found. (role-with-double-backticks)
pep-0665.rst:198: role use a single backtick, double backtick found. (role-with-double-backticks)

Links to file:

• https://github.com/python/peps/blob/ebefef14d5df408a4a0f8644a454073338fa41aa/pep-0665.rst
• https://raw.githubusercontent.com/python/peps/ebefef14d5df408a4a0f8644a454073338fa41aa/pep-0665.rst
• https://peps.python.org/pep-0665/#secure-by-design

Preview of the valid :all: at the end of a code block:

[JulienPalard]

Thanks for this issue! I resolved it (but not released yet).

[CAM-Gerlach]

Thanks!

[JulienPalard]

(Released as 0.6.6.)