-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Releases #1
Comments
Thanks for your response – and glad to see you're now tagging releases! And especially updating versionCode now. Could you also attach the APK files "plainly" (i.e. the pure Also: is it (still) necessary to have the Debug flag set? As for older versions: Thanks, but no need. If the always latest is available, that's fine for me – so yes, "just continue onward from here" 😉 |
hi @softwareengineer1 if 2.1.3 is ready could you push out a new release? |
Also maybe bump versionCode to |
@softwareengineer1 ^^?? 🙏 |
As it currently stands, your app is not (yet) on F-Droid – and no longer up-to-date in my repo. The latter is caused by your attaching ZIP files inside the release description instead of APK files in the "attachments". Could you please get that fixed? |
Ah, well, there wasn't even an update… Are you still maintaining this, @softwareengineer1? Are you even still active yourself? |
@softwareengineer1 any word? Uncertainty is unnerving – but we won't declare a horse dead if it's still running just because we cannot see it, so… any word would be appreciated. Thanks in advance! |
Might I suggest you use the Github release system instead of hosting the archives inside the repo? Easy to do, short instructions can be found in the Github help: Creating Releases. If apart from tagging you also attach the files there, that makes them easier to find.
As for the Android
.apk
files: I'm a bit irritated that v2.0.7 should be the very first version (especially with a v1.1.5 lying next to it):Could you please take care to increase
versionCode
with each new release, and haveversionName
reflect the real one? Otherwise this causes trouble/confusion on the users' end.Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: