You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As stated in the README you include several projects which are GPL-2.0-only. You cannot simply change the license to GPL-3.0{-only,-or-later}, because GPL-3.0 is not compatible with GPL-2.0-only.
It seems ext-utils/gprof2dot.py is the only file that contains are GPL-3.0 header. The other files are GPL-2.0-only, according to their headers.
As ext-utils/gprof2dot.py is only a script that's not compiled into the sources, it not problem that it is GPL-3.0.
I recommend to change the license information in README.md to GPL-2.0-only. Not sure if you need the confirmation of all contributors as the sources files they might have modified explicitly state that the code is GPL-2.0-only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As stated in the README you include several projects which are GPL-2.0-only. You cannot simply change the license to GPL-3.0{-only,-or-later}, because GPL-3.0 is not compatible with GPL-2.0-only.
It seems
ext-utils/gprof2dot.py
is the only file that contains are GPL-3.0 header. The other files are GPL-2.0-only, according to their headers.As
ext-utils/gprof2dot.py
is only a script that's not compiled into the sources, it not problem that it is GPL-3.0.I recommend to change the license information in README.md to GPL-2.0-only. Not sure if you need the confirmation of all contributors as the sources files they might have modified explicitly state that the code is GPL-2.0-only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: