Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to transfer (checkin&checkout at once) and to change status while checking in/out #8280

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
mamayer opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 11 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Comments

@mamayer
Copy link

mamayer commented Jul 29, 2020

Expected Behavior (or desired behavior if a feature request)

(This might be seen as multiple requests at once, but they are closely related to each other)

I'd like to have a "transfer"-button with which I can

  • change the location from "Room A" to "Stock in main-building" (yes, we have multiple stocks)
  • change the status from "Ready to use" [deployable] to "Maintenance" [not deployable]
  • while changing the check-in-status from "checked out" to "checked in" because it's moving into the stock

another example would be

  • change the location from "User A" to "User B"
  • while not changing the check-in-status - it stays "checked out"

or

  • change the location from "User A" to "Trash dump"
  • change the status from "Ready to use" [deployable] to "Scrap" [archived]
  • while changing the check-in-status from "checked out" to "checked in" because it's moving away from the user

In short I'd like to freely change locations and statusses, while moving to stock-locations in considered being a "check in" and moving out of stock-locations is a "check out".

If we are not supposed to use SnipeIT with multiple stocks, that's ok. Than I still request an option to change the location/user from one to another without checking in. Eg. "transfer monitor 123 from Sam to Max".


Actual Behavior

If we take an asset from one user/location and give it to an other, we always have to check it in and out again, which is quite complicated. It's not possible to move an asset in one step without checking in.

When creating assets we can't keep track in which stock the asset is, because providing a location/user on asset creation will immediately check the asset out - even if it's in a stock.

We can't change the current location of checked-in assets as SnipeIT seems to work with one stock only and everything "checked in" is supposed to be in the one-and-only stock.


Please confirm you have done the following before posting your bug report:


Provide answers to these questions:

  • Is this a fresh install or an upgrade?
    • Fresh
  • Version of Snipe-IT you're running
    • v4.7.5 build 4137 (g55ee90b25)
  • Version of PHP you're running
    • 7.1.30-2+0~20190710.21+debian9~1.gbp011d3c
  • Version of MySQL/MariaDB you're running
    • whichever comes with snipe-it docker
  • What OS and web server you're running Snipe-IT on
    • Debian 9.9 stretch
  • What method you used to install Snipe-IT (install.sh, manual installation, docker, etc)
    • Docker
  • WITH DEBUG TURNED ON, if you're getting an error in your browser, include that error
  • What specific Snipe-IT page you're on, and what specific element you're interacting with to trigger the error
  • If a stacktrace is provided in the error, include that too.
  • Any errors that appear in your browser's error console.
  • Confirm whether the error is reproducible on the demo: https://snipeitapp.com/demo.
  • Include any additional information you can find in storage/logs and your webserver's logs.
  • Include what you've done so far in the installation, and if you got any error messages along the way.
  • Indicate whether or not you've manually edited any data directly in the database
    • Nope
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 4, 2020

Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the stale label Oct 4, 2020
@mamayer
Copy link
Author

mamayer commented Oct 4, 2020 via email

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 4, 2020

Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Oct 4, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 25, 2020

Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 25, 2020
@mamayer
Copy link
Author

mamayer commented Apr 21, 2021

Yes it is

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 21, 2021

Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Apr 21, 2021
@hesske
Copy link

hesske commented Jul 13, 2021

Yes, if it was possible for ones that manage assets to transfer an asset to another company via an action dropdown option that included a field for the reason for transfer as well as would send a notification to the receiving company manager that would be awesome!

@lisymart
Copy link

It's still relevant and needed.

@cbrands38
Copy link

This would be an amazing feature

@jpvlerbe
Copy link

jpvlerbe commented Jun 11, 2024

We also sometimes find users transferring goods from one person to the next without passing through the "stock".
At that time we check in and check out again, which is a bit cumbersome.
It is not too bad, and the tool is awesome. We just have to do it that often, that it would really save on time a lot to do it in a single go.

Possibly it could be adding a bullet point that dynamically adds the fields for doing a recheck-out?
image

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Sep 4, 2024

Duplicate of #5834

@snipe snipe marked this as a duplicate of #5834 Sep 4, 2024
@snipe snipe closed this as completed Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants