Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[email protected] odd behaviours #1468

Closed
josepot opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

[email protected] odd behaviours #1468

josepot opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@josepot
Copy link
Contributor

josepot commented Dec 12, 2023

I have been trying the latest version (2.0.14) of smoldot and I have observed 3 different behaviours:

  1. Everything works perfectly well
  2. It gets completely stuck during the warp sync process
  3. The warp sync process takes a while to complete, and once it completes the "initialized" event gets emitted, but no other events follow after that.

I was able to capture the detailed smoldot logs of the 3rd case using the code from this repo. The logs:

2023-12-12T12:21:08.880Z - starting new chainHead follow subscription
2023-12-12T12:21:31.749Z - Initialized - 0x4ab0663d9dc0247e519d767c4232dd5cefb88049f72457ad628eb3f41c532614

It took more than 20 seconds for the initialized event to arrive, when most of the times it takes ~2 seconds, and then no other events came afterwords (I waited > 1 minute).

I will try to capture more logs and I will be posting them in this issue.

@josepot
Copy link
Contributor Author

josepot commented Dec 12, 2023

The logs of an instance in which smoldot seems to get stuck during warp sync:

smoldot-logs.txt

I waited for more than 2 minutes and the "initialized" event never arrived.

@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor

tomaka commented Dec 12, 2023

The node repeatedly tries to send a warp sync request to 12D3KooWS9ZcvRxyzrSf6p63QfTCWs12nLoNKhGux865crgxVA4H, who repeatedly denies it.

@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor

tomaka commented Dec 14, 2023

I forgot to mention it, but it would be fixed by #1442

@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor

tomaka commented Dec 17, 2023

Closing in favor of #1442

@tomaka tomaka closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants