You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently use aws_smity_types::Blob, which is the right type for future proofing, but we really want to allow customers to pass in Vec<u8> directly. We should contribute the missing Into<Blob> impl in aws_smithy_types, or for a shorter term fix just use Vec<u8> directly while waiting for that to land.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We currently use
aws_smity_types::Blob
, which is the right type for future proofing, but we really want to allow customers to pass inVec<u8>
directly. We should contribute the missingInto<Blob>
impl inaws_smithy_types
, or for a shorter term fix just useVec<u8>
directly while waiting for that to land.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: