-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modeling/Inversion with ground relief above sea level #172
Comments
Oh, it seems negative spacing doesn't work:
|
I'm actually not quite sure what value people usually put in the SegY header for these type of geometry, is there some open data you are using that shows what these values usually are? Negative spacing will be very problematic yeah, negative origin would be the way to go as long as the segy is read correctly and put negative values for the rec depth. |
@mloubout I'm not sure about open source data but in SEGY header positive elevations usually mean above sea level. Even though seismic software may treat this differently and I always look for the documentation whether above sea level is positive or negative. With JUDI it seems the simplest solution is to treat I propose to add an argument to function Geometry(data::SegyIO.SeisBlock; key="source", segy_depth_key="", dt=nothing, t=nothing, elev_mult=1f0) and use It is worth to add information to the documentation that JUDI treats negative elevations above sea level and positive elevations below sea level to make it consistent with model origin/spacings. |
I don't think adding this keyword to Geometry is a good idea, I tend to prefer to have a robust reader rather than having a lot of arguments. So if the |
Yes removing |
Hi,
Lets suppose we work with land data.
Of course we have to take into account the relief (elevations).
If the land elevation is above sea level (say
+100
meters) then probably model's vertical origin should start with-100
right? and vertical spacing is positive (say+25
m).The problem is that I don't know what sign should have
RecGroupElevation
andSourceSurfaceElevation
.I think they should be
-100
m but anyway JUDI reads them by absolute value: link1, link2.In this case most likely the JUDI will treat them as they located below sea level.
Also there is more difficult case when elevation on the profile vary from positive to negative values.
Taking absolute elevations will lead to incorrect geometry.
If all my elevations are above sea level may I set vertical origin to positive (
+100
m) and vertical spacing to negative (-25
m)?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: