-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initialising the temperature of the wind #42
Comments
I guess I don't understand your concern here. The original rationale for this was to duplicate more or less the set up and nomenclature from some of Leon's early papers. The radiative temperature is something one can guess from the sources of radiation, but the electron temperature is harder to guess. I believe this may be the way, all of our models start out, i.e by setting the electron temperature to 0.9 of the electron temperature. So in that sense, our current choice is not counterintuitive. You must have a "use case" in mind, that makes counterintuitive to you. Perhaps you could explain more fully. |
Ah, I see. |
I'm not opposed, but I think you need to describe more completely the "use case" and why it is important to have it. Knox S. Long |
The primary 'use case' is when one wants to fix the temperature of the wind. One needs to hack the code to do this, by disabling calc_te in the ionization, but one also has to set the wind temperature to what you want /0.9, so that the te=tr/0.9 means you get what you want. |
Having just confused myself by trying to get a constant temperature for the thin shell, I thought it was worth posting this 'feature' for discussion
When one sets the initial temperature of the wind, using the keyword wind.t.init in the parameter file, this gets set to geo.twind.
When the wind is initialised, this gets assigned to t_r in all cells.
Then, the normal behaviour is to set t_e to 0.9x this value (lucy guess).
This seems a bit counter intuitive - for my money, I feel that when I'm setting the wind temperature, I want to be setting the electron temperature, not the temperature of the radiation field. This would be pretty simple to change - just set t_e to geo.twind, and by all means set t_r to t_e/0.9 - just to give it a value.
Thoughts?
Nick
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: