Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[r] Publish tiledbsoma on CRAN #1515

Closed
mlin opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

[r] Publish tiledbsoma on CRAN #1515

mlin opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
ci documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-discussion r-api

Comments

@mlin
Copy link
Member

mlin commented Jun 30, 2023

Follow-up from #1427

All agree we should publish tiledbsoma on CRAN to make installation as simple as possible for users and dependent packages. There were some differing opinions on when we should begin publishing on CRAN (how mature we should be) given that the CRAN maintainers may frown on updating packages there too frequently. In the meantime we're publishing through r-universe (configured to track GitHub Releases).

This ticket is to decide when it's the appropriate time for CRAN, write down the "procedure" in doing so, and update the readme to point users there instead of r-universe.

@mojaveazure
Copy link
Member

One thing to note about CRAN: packages are required to be cross-platform

Package authors should make all reasonable efforts to provide cross-platform portable code

Exceptions can be made (à la {unix}), but I believe CRAN's preference is for all packages to work on Windows, macOS, and a few flavors of Linux (Debian and Fedora)

@eddelbuettel please correct me if I'm wrong

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Contributor

eddelbuettel commented Jun 30, 2023

Like many things that is a preference and a desire but not a hard constraint. We do build on two common platforms, that should be good enough. DESCRIPTION has a field OS_type with value 'unix' for a few packages. So that is not a blocker. None of what you said is wrong but in aggregate it simply is not a constraint. There are (were?) even Windows-only packages. "It all depends" and can be explained.

@johnkerl johnkerl changed the title [r] publish tiledbsoma on CRAN [r] Publish tiledbsoma on CRAN Jul 3, 2023
@johnkerl
Copy link
Member

@eddelbuettel should this now be closed in favor of #1582?

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Contributor

@johnkerl I will leave the juggling of overlapping / partily redundant issue tickets in your capable hands. Works for me either way, you may want to consult with @mlin too before closing / merging / extending.

@mlin
Copy link
Member Author

mlin commented Sep 12, 2023

@johnkerl @eddelbuettel No objection to merging. Comparing the tickets, it looks to me like the only extra items noted in this one are (1) update our written release procedures to reflect publishing to CRAN and (2) update the user-facing readme/docs to refer to CRAN instead of r-universe. Perhaps obvious but certainly part of the scope.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-discussion r-api
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants