about your baseline

[abcdvzz]

Could you please tell me how you did the experiments of baseline? Could you release the code of baseline? I notice that your baseline method achieves 77.2% on veri according to Table 6 in your paper which is a very high baseline beating down the other sotas.

[silverbulletmdc]

You can change the veri776_b64_pven.yml file and delete the local-triplet loss. The PVEN without local loss can be regarded as a strong-reid-baseline.

[abcdvzz]

No local-triplet loss means no vehicle part parser, no view-aware feature alignment, no common visible feature enhancement. So using a plain resnet50 with some tricks can get 77.2% on veri776. Am I right?

[silverbulletmdc]

Yes

[gutengzczy]

Hi, sir, is it the same as baseline when the lambda_ was set to 0? There is no local_distmat when lambda_=0, and uses the global distmat to calculate cmc and mAP, am I right? Hope for your reply, thanks!

[silverbulletmdc]

Hi, sir, is it the same as baseline when the lambda_ was set to 0? There is no local_distmat when lambda_=0, and uses the global distmat to calculate cmc and mAP, am I right? Hope for your reply, thanks!

Yes