Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prefer to work with upstream Lem #12

Open
dsheets opened this issue Oct 2, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Prefer to work with upstream Lem #12

dsheets opened this issue Oct 2, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@dsheets
Copy link
Contributor

dsheets commented Oct 2, 2015

@tomjridge :

Currently we use Thomas' version of Lem. Ideally we would work with the upstream version of Lem.

What are the differences between Thomas' version and upstream Lem? What do we need to do to start working with the upstream Lem? Can we work directly with upstream Lem, or do we need to maintain some diffs?

Are we currently tracking bugfixes to Lem?

@dsheets :

My tests have been against https://bitbucket.org/dsheets/lem which is a fork of Thomas' fork. I've contributed a few of the build system fixes back to the main project. I would very much like to stop having this fork and use the upstream (and get the upstream to incorporate whatever we actually require from them and then produce an actual, numbered, opam-distributed release).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant