Add: product form tests (other options, catalog) #57
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the vendor functionalities within the application, particularly focusing on product management, order permissions, payment methods, support ticket management, and compliance features. New capabilities have been added for vendors to manage product options, including visibility and catalog modes, along with the ability to handle support tickets more effectively. Additionally, the RMA settings for vendors have been expanded to include various warranty types. The changes are reflected in the relevant test cases to ensure comprehensive coverage of the new functionalities. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorSettings.spec.ts (5)
123-125: LGTM! Consider adding an assertion.The new test case for RMA settings with no warranty looks good. It follows the existing pattern and tests a specific scenario.
Consider adding an assertion after setting the RMA settings to verify that the changes were applied correctly. For example:
await vendor.setRmaSettings({ ...data.vendor.rma, type: 'no_warranty' }); // Add an assertion here to verify the settings were applied correctly await expect(vendor.getRmaSettings()).resolves.toMatchObject({ type: 'no_warranty' });
127-129: Specify the warranty type explicitly for clarity.While this test case uses the default RMA settings, it would be more clear and consistent with the other new test cases to explicitly specify the warranty type.
Consider modifying the test case as follows:
test('vendor can set rma settings (warranty included limited)', { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => { await vendor.setRmaSettings({ ...data.vendor.rma, type: 'included_warranty', length: 'limited' }); });This change makes the test case more explicit about what it's testing and aligns it with the naming convention used in the other new test cases.
131-133: LGTM! Consider adding the warranty type for consistency.The new test case for RMA settings with lifetime warranty looks good. It follows the existing pattern and tests a specific scenario.
For consistency with the other test cases and to make it more explicit, consider modifying the RMA settings object to include the warranty type:
await vendor.setRmaSettings({ ...data.vendor.rma, type: 'included_warranty', length: 'lifetime' });This change makes it clear that we're testing an included warranty with a lifetime length.
135-137: LGTM! Consider adding an assertion for completeness.The new test case for RMA settings with addon warranty looks good. It follows the existing pattern and tests a specific scenario.
For completeness and consistency with the earlier suggestion, consider adding an assertion after setting the RMA settings:
await vendor.setRmaSettings({ ...data.vendor.rma, type: 'addon_warranty' }); // Add an assertion here to verify the settings were applied correctly await expect(vendor.getRmaSettings()).resolves.toMatchObject({ type: 'addon_warranty' });This addition would help verify that the settings were applied correctly.
123-138: Great addition of test cases for RMA settings!The new test cases significantly improve the coverage of RMA settings by testing different warranty scenarios:
- No warranty
- Warranty included (limited)
- Warranty included (lifetime)
- Warranty as addon
These additions will help ensure that the RMA settings functionality works correctly across various warranty types. The test cases are well-structured and consistent with the existing code style.
To further enhance these tests, consider:
- Adding assertions to verify the applied settings.
- Ensuring consistent naming and parameter passing across all test cases.
- If not already present, add negative test cases (e.g., invalid warranty types or lengths) to ensure proper error handling.
These enhancements will make the test suite more robust and comprehensive.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (4)
300-303: LGTM: Test case for adding product catalog mode.The test case correctly sets up the environment and verifies the addition of product catalog mode.
Consider adding an assertion to verify that the database option was successfully updated before proceeding with the test.
305-308: LGTM: Test case for adding product catalog mode with price hidden.The test case correctly sets up the environment with multiple options and verifies the addition of product catalog mode with price hidden.
Consider adding assertions to verify that both database options were successfully updated before proceeding with the test.
310-318: LGTM: Test cases for removing product catalog mode.Both test cases correctly set up the environment and verify the removal of product catalog mode, with the second case specifically testing the removal of the price hidden option.
Consider adding assertions to verify that the database options were successfully updated before proceeding with each test. Also, it might be beneficial to add comments explaining the difference between the two test cases for clarity.
269-318: Overall assessment: Excellent addition of test cases for product other options and catalog mode.The new test cases significantly enhance the coverage of the product details functionality. They are well-structured, follow established patterns, and cover important aspects of product management such as status, visibility, purchase notes, reviews, and catalog mode options.
Some minor suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding assertions to verify database option updates before proceeding with tests.
- Add comments to clarify the differences between similar test cases, especially for catalog mode removal.
These additions will greatly contribute to ensuring the robustness of the product management features.
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Overall impact of new vendor featuresThe addition of these new vendor features for product management represents a significant enhancement to the platform's functionality. These changes allow vendors more granular control over their product listings, which can lead to improved product presentation and potentially increased sales.
However, it's crucial to consider the following points:
User Education: Ensure that comprehensive documentation and possibly in-app guidance are provided to help vendors understand and effectively use these new features.
Performance Impact: With additional options and settings, there might be a slight increase in database load or page load times. It would be wise to monitor performance metrics after deploying these changes.
Backwards Compatibility: Verify that these new features don't negatively impact existing products or cause issues with third-party integrations.
Security Considerations: As always with new features, ensure proper validation and sanitization are in place, especially for user-input fields like purchase notes.
Testing: Comprehensive testing should be conducted, including edge cases and potential misuse scenarios.
Consider implementing a feature flag system if not already in place. This would allow for easier rollback or gradual rollout of these new features if any issues are discovered in production.
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (4)
1124-1126: Handle unexpected 'choice' values in the switch statementIn the
defaultcase of theswitchstatement, no action is taken when an unrecognizedchoiceis provided. It might be beneficial to add error handling or a warning message to alert developers of invalidchoicevalues, which can aid in debugging.
1147-1149: Handle unexpected 'choice' values in the switch statementSimilarly, in the second
switchstatement, thedefaultcase does not handle unexpectedchoicevalues. Consider implementing error handling or logging to manage invalid inputs effectively.
Line range hint
1151-1161: Improve parameter naming for clarityThe parameter
hidePricein the methodaddProductCatalogModemay not clearly convey its intent. Renaming it to something likeshouldHidePriceorenableHidePricecan improve code readability by making the purpose of the parameter more explicit.
1163-1180: Improve parameter naming for better understandingThe parameter
onlyPriceinremoveProductCatalogModemight cause confusion about its purpose. Consider renaming it toremoveOnlyPriceorunhideOnlyPriceto more accurately reflect its functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorSettings.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (6)
272-274: LGTM: Test case for adding product status.The test case follows the established pattern and correctly tests the ability to add product status as part of other options.
276-278: LGTM: Test case for adding product visibility.The test case is well-structured and correctly tests the ability to add product visibility as part of other options.
280-282: LGTM: Test case for adding purchase note.The test case is properly implemented to test the addition of a purchase note as part of other product options.
284-286: LGTM: Test case for removing purchase note.The test case correctly verifies the removal of a purchase note by setting it to an empty string.
288-290: LGTM: Test case for adding product review option.The test case is well-implemented to verify the addition of the product review option.
292-294: LGTM: Test case for removing product review option.The test case correctly verifies the removal of the product review option by setting
enableReviewto false.tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1)
161-170: New vendor features added for product managementThese new features enhance the vendor's ability to manage product details and settings:
- Product status and visibility options
- Purchase note management
- Product review settings
- Catalog mode options
These additions provide vendors with more control over their product listings and how they appear to customers.
However, it's important to consider the following:
- Ensure that these new options are properly documented for vendors.
- Verify that the UI/UX for these new features is intuitive and consistent with existing product management interfaces.
- Consider adding validation to prevent misuse of these features (e.g., ensuring purchase notes are appropriate).
To ensure these new features are properly integrated, please run the following script:
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests