You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do we also need/want to allow for conversions to dimensions? is something like expr -> Energy useful? Users could always add type annotations, i.e. use sth like expr: Energy to make sure that something is an energy.
users might also like to explicitly convert to:
expr -> base
expr -> shortest
expr -> canonical
Do we also need/want to allow for conversions to dimensions? is something like
expr -> Energy
useful? Users could always add type annotations, i.e. use sth likeexpr: Energy
to make sure that something is an energy.see #3 for implicit conversions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: