Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ethereum L2s #288

Closed
kayabaNerve opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Ethereum L2s #288

kayabaNerve opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
discussion This requires discussion ethereum An issue with the Ethereum integration

Comments

@kayabaNerve
Copy link
Member

Due to Ethereum's significant gas costs, we should additionally support L2s. This issue will focus on EVM-compatible L2s, which should be trivial to integrate. Per #287, our sole additional requirement would be either Flashbots or EIP-4337.

Non-EVM-compatible L2s, such as Starkware, should be discussed individually in distinct issues.

I'm primarily interested in Arbitrum, which has come out as the #1 L2 per https://l2beat.com/scaling/tvl. Optimism would be the second choice, yet even when you exclude the ARB TVL from Arbitrum, Arbitrum is 3x as large.

From a technical diversity standpoint, also adding ZkSync Era, Polygon's zkEVM, Scroll, or Aztec would be solid. ZkSync Era offers account abstraction, removing the need for Flashbots/4337.

@kayabaNerve kayabaNerve added discussion This requires discussion ethereum An issue with the Ethereum integration labels May 8, 2023
@Cevedale
Copy link

What do you think of Scroll tho?

@kayabaNerve
Copy link
Member Author

Scroll was one of the listed options under technical diversity. I have yet to do a deep dive into the various zkEVMs from a security standpoint (upgradeability, ZK proofs used) nor their functionality (regarding Ethereum equivalence). One of the biggest impacts would be the support for relayer technology (EIP-4337, Flashbots) though (as originally stated in the issue).

@kayabaNerve
Copy link
Member Author

Closing for the same reason as #175 #176 #177 #178 #179

@kayabaNerve kayabaNerve closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion This requires discussion ethereum An issue with the Ethereum integration
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants