You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see that there are two limb darkening parameters (u1, u2) in the fit_par file and the option fix_ld in the pcf. Thus, to fix the LD parameters, one could either fix their values to given numbers in the fit_par file or use model results from exotic-LD for them using the pcf. When I state in both files that I want to fix them, which values have priority?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, fixing the limb-darkening (LD) values in PACMAN based on an exotic-ld run hasn't been tested thoroughly yet. If you want to use a literature value for the LD parameter(s) I would just set it in the fit_par.
I agree that "fix_ld" is a confusing name for a parameter. It should be rather called "use_ld_file" because it should eventually set if the user wants to use the precalculated LD values in the ld_file or not.
I see that there are two limb darkening parameters (u1, u2) in the fit_par file and the option fix_ld in the pcf. Thus, to fix the LD parameters, one could either fix their values to given numbers in the fit_par file or use model results from exotic-LD for them using the pcf. When I state in both files that I want to fix them, which values have priority?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: