Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Add ability to define reusable field settings #47

Closed
jsunsawyer opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Add ability to define reusable field settings #47

jsunsawyer opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@jsunsawyer
Copy link

We often use entry types to handle data to help with content translations, define reusable content blocks, set scheduled announcements, etc.

Link fields need to have these removed, so the user is only presented with entries that they should be linking to.

As soon as we uncheck all (from Categories, Entries, etc) and define our available sources, we end up with a project management nightmare. The next time a new entry type is added, we have to remember to go into every field, sometimes deeply nested in Matrix or Super Tables, and ensure that we add that type as an available source.

Outside of handling sources, being able to define our other options would also be a welcome improvement. Currently, every time I add a new link field, I have to go through the whole setup process again.

If we could define all of our unique link types in a settings panel, then optionally select from them when creating a link field (much like related entries), this would greatly reduce the chance for errors and save us a lot of hassle.

@sebastian-lenz
Copy link
Owner

I don't think we should go with a custom UI for something like this. Maybe an API like an event for altering the link field settings would be a more powerful way to allow usage scenarios like this?

@jsunsawyer
Copy link
Author

Something similar to redactor config files could work. The thing about having this be part of the backend is that we'd have visibility of all of our asset sources, categories, entries, etc. It might become too cumbersome to manage via config files.

@sebastian-lenz
Copy link
Owner

I'll close this issue due to inactivity. I've decided to collect all feature requests in a markdown document, see https://github.com/sebastian-lenz/craft-linkfield/blob/master/WISHLIST.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants