Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate use of EasyBuild for AToM components #2

Open
orso82 opened this issue Apr 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Investigate use of EasyBuild for AToM components #2

orso82 opened this issue Apr 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@orso82
Copy link
Contributor

orso82 commented Apr 1, 2019

ITER is using EasyBuild on their cluster to manage software: https://easybuild.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

I have not looked to much into it but the description of the EasyBuild project reads "a software build and installation framework that allows you to manage (scientific) software on High Performance Computing (HPC) systems in an efficient way."
which sounds promising

@kalling would you have some time to investigate if this could be a viable option for distributing AToM software. Perhaps as an alternative to SPACK?

@orso82 orso82 added the question Further information is requested label Apr 1, 2019
@jcandy
Copy link
Contributor

jcandy commented Apr 1, 2019

Hopefully this is better than NotSoEasyBuild.

@kalling
Copy link
Contributor

kalling commented Apr 1, 2019

A while back I watched a presentation that covered some of the differences between Spack and Easybuild. At the time, It seemed like Spack was closer to what we wanted, but I will look at it again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants