Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Router: handle for-do/yield the same as while #3050

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2022

Conversation

kitbellew
Copy link
Collaborator

We currently handle while with multi-stat expression differently than with a single-stat expression. Lets use the same approach with for. Follow-on to #3037.

We currently handle `while` with multi-stat expression differently than
with a single-stat expression. Lets use the same approach with `for`.
@kitbellew kitbellew requested a review from tgodzik January 10, 2022 17:29
@kitbellew kitbellew merged commit 37a0640 into scalameta:master Jan 11, 2022
@kitbellew kitbellew deleted the 3050 branch January 11, 2022 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants