You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The returned objects from the shaw_opening_angle_method is a flattened array. We know the array shape as an input though, so it probably makes more sense to return the reshaped arrays of sea_angles.
Additionally, there is another array shoreangles created, but I'm not clear on what this does.
There is probably quite a bit more optimization that can be done to this method/implementation though, so it would be a good target for a fun afternoon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can confirm some optimization is needed. Run into segmentation faults when trying to process larger arrays (e.g., those from remote sensing imagery - example below has shape (4398, 5882) which equates to 25869036 values).
Example using the fly_mask.npy array stored in zip file: fly_mask.zip
I am closing this per #144, which greatly improved things. I can also confirm that the Fly River delta data can be processed and return a reasonable result.
The returned objects from the
shaw_opening_angle_method
is a flattened array. We know the array shape as an input though, so it probably makes more sense to return the reshaped arrays ofsea_angles
.Additionally, there is another array
shoreangles
created, but I'm not clear on what this does.There is probably quite a bit more optimization that can be done to this method/implementation though, so it would be a good target for a fun afternoon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: