diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index bc95af9..986a47d 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ![rspec-sorbet](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2643026/63100456-02c12c00-bf6f-11e9-8430-630a27bc6e42.png)
 
-# RSpec Sorbet [![Gem Version](https://badge.fury.io/rb/rspec-sorbet.svg)](https://badge.fury.io/rb/rspec-sorbet) ![CI Badge](https://github.com/tricycle/rspec-sorbet/workflows/Continuous%20Integration/badge.svg)
+# RSpec Sorbet [![Gem Version](https://badge.fury.io/rb/rspec-sorbet.svg)](https://badge.fury.io/rb/rspec-sorbet) ![CI Badge](https://github.com/samuelgiles/rspec-sorbet/workflows/Continuous%20Integration/badge.svg)
 
 A small gem consisting of helpers for using Sorbet & RSpec together.
 
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ require 'rspec/sorbet'
 
 Out of the box if you're using `instance_double`, `class_double` or `object_double` in your specs you'll encounter errors such as the following:
 
-```
+```ruby
  TypeError:
        Parameter 'my_parameter': Expected type MyObject, got type RSpec::Mocks::InstanceVerifyingDouble with value #<InstanceDouble(MyObject) (anonymous)>
        Caller: /Users/samuelgiles/Documents/Projects/Clients/Bellroy/bellroy/spec/lib/checkout/use_cases/my_use_case.rb:9
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ RSpec::Sorbet.allow_doubles!
 
 ### `eq` matcher usage with `T::Struct`'s
 
-Using the [`eq` matcher](https://www.rubydoc.info/github/rspec/rspec-expectations/RSpec%2FMatchers:eq) to compare [`T::Struct`'s](https://sorbet.org/docs/tstruct) might not behave as you'd expect whereby two separate instances of the same struct class with identical attributes are not `==` out of the box. The standalone [sorbet-struct-comparable](https://github.com/tricycle/sorbet-struct-comparable) gem may be of interest if you are looking for a simple attribute based comparison that will help make the `eq` matcher behave as you expect.
+Using the [`eq` matcher](https://www.rubydoc.info/github/rspec/rspec-expectations/RSpec%2FMatchers:eq) to compare [`T::Struct`'s](https://sorbet.org/docs/tstruct) might not behave as you'd expect whereby two separate instances of the same struct class with identical attributes are not `==` out of the box. The standalone [sorbet-struct-comparable](https://github.com/samuelgiles/sorbet-struct-comparable) gem may be of interest if you are looking for a simple attribute based comparison that will help make the `eq` matcher behave as you expect.
 
 ### Specifying a custom validation handler
 
diff --git a/rspec-sorbet.gemspec b/rspec-sorbet.gemspec
index 3dccf89..f0b37e0 100644
--- a/rspec-sorbet.gemspec
+++ b/rspec-sorbet.gemspec
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
   spec.name          = "rspec-sorbet"
   spec.version       = RSpec::Sorbet::VERSION
   spec.authors       = ["Samuel Giles"]
-  spec.email         = ["samuel.giles@bellroy.com"]
+  spec.email         = ["sam@samuelgil.es"]
 
   spec.summary       = "A small gem consisting of helpers for using Sorbet & RSpec together."
-  spec.homepage      = "https://github.com/tricycle/rspec-sorbet"
+  spec.homepage      = "https://github.com/samuelgiles/rspec-sorbet"
   spec.license       = "MIT"
 
   # Specify which files should be added to the gem when it is released.