Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSQ annotation - should be frameshift #2212

Closed
JakeHagen opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

CSQ annotation - should be frameshift #2212

JakeHagen opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@JakeHagen
Copy link

Hello

I annotated this variant chr7-74711106-CAAG-CT with bcftools csq v1.20. For all transcripts it is giving me inframe_deletion&splice_region as the consequence. I think this should be a frameshift variant. Is there something I am not understanding, or could this be a bug?

Thank you
Jake

@pd3
Copy link
Member

pd3 commented Jun 19, 2024

At a cursory glance yes, however it really depends on the sequence context and the gene model. More information is needed to debug this. Can you share a small test case to reproduce the problem please? It can be created for example like this

/path/to/bcftools-dir/test/csq/make-csq-test -f ref.fa -g genes.gff -o test -p  74711106-CAAG-CT -t TRANSCRIPT_ID

@JakeHagen
Copy link
Author

Thank you for looking at this. Attached is the test case created with the command

../bcftools-1.20/test/csq/make-csq-test -f ./genome.hg38rg.fa -g ./ensembl/Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.112.gff3.gz -o test -p 74711106-CAAG-CT -t ENST00000573035

bcftools_csq_test_7-74711106-CAAG-CT.tar.gz

@pd3 pd3 closed this as completed in a05480c Jun 27, 2024
@pd3
Copy link
Member

pd3 commented Jun 27, 2024

Thank you for the test case. I can confirm this was a bug, and it should be fixed now by a05480c, please try it out

@JakeHagen
Copy link
Author

Yep it is now being reported as frameshift&splice_region
Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants