Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chart.subchart_poset, superchart_poset, Manifold.chart_poset #31771

Open
mkoeppe opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

Chart.subchart_poset, superchart_poset, Manifold.chart_poset #31771

mkoeppe opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented May 3, 2021

Families of charts on a manifold are quasiordered by set inclusion of domains, ignoring coord_string. Subqosets can be defined by filtering by coord_string; an optional argument of Manifold.chart_poset will do this.

As in #31736, the poset quotients by the equivalence relation, so its elements are finite families of charts that have the same domain.

Depends on #31720

CC: @egourgoulhon @mjungmath

Component: manifolds

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31771

@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-9.4 milestone May 3, 2021
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented May 3, 2021

Dependencies: #31720

@mjungmath
Copy link

comment:2

Probably perfect substitute for the current display implementation of scalar fields.

@mjungmath
Copy link

comment:3

I think this quasi order is exactly what we need for presheaves.

Since the set of frames as well as of charts each constitute a presheaf, what if we wrap this up in #31703?

Besides, what do you mean with "Subqosets"?

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented May 3, 2021

comment:4

qoset = quasi-ordered set

@mjungmath
Copy link

comment:5

But when we take coord_string into account again, shouldn't this become a poset? So you mean subqosets that are actual posets, right?

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented May 3, 2021

comment:6

Two subsets with a different name can turn out to be equal. If two restrictions of a chart are defined on these two subsets, then I think these will be distinct but equal elements of the qoset as well.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented May 3, 2021

comment:7

Replying to @mjungmath:

Since the set of frames as well as of charts each constitute a presheaf, what if we wrap this up in #31703?

Sure, that would work; perhaps you can expand that ticket's description a bit.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.4, sage-9.5 Jul 19, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.5, sage-9.6 Dec 14, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.6, sage-9.7 Mar 5, 2022
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.7, sage-9.8 Aug 31, 2022
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.8, sage-9.9 Jan 7, 2023
@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-10.0 milestone Mar 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants