-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chart.subchart_poset, superchart_poset, Manifold.chart_poset #31771
Comments
Dependencies: #31720 |
comment:2
Probably perfect substitute for the current |
comment:3
I think this quasi order is exactly what we need for presheaves. Since the set of frames as well as of charts each constitute a presheaf, what if we wrap this up in #31703? Besides, what do you mean with "Subqosets"? |
comment:4
qoset = quasi-ordered set |
comment:5
But when we take |
comment:6
Two subsets with a different name can turn out to be equal. If two restrictions of a chart are defined on these two subsets, then I think these will be distinct but equal elements of the qoset as well. |
comment:7
Replying to @mjungmath:
Sure, that would work; perhaps you can expand that ticket's description a bit. |
Families of charts on a manifold are quasiordered by set inclusion of domains, ignoring
coord_string
. Subqosets can be defined by filtering bycoord_string
; an optional argument ofManifold.chart_poset
will do this.As in #31736, the poset quotients by the equivalence relation, so its elements are finite families of charts that have the same domain.
Depends on #31720
CC: @egourgoulhon @mjungmath
Component: manifolds
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31771
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: