Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

On sbcl and ccl, number is strange #3

Open
commander-trashdin opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

On sbcl and ccl, number is strange #3

commander-trashdin opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@commander-trashdin
Copy link
Contributor

Number is NOT a subtypep of (or real complex). You have your own subtypep so you probably do not care, but still informing you about this. More here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Common_Lisp/comments/nm4glc/real_and_complex_are_somehow_not_all_numbers/
@Bike
Copy link
Member

Bike commented Jun 1, 2021

It's true the standard doesn't define that complex and real define the entire space of number. Could be another config flag I guess, but I don't know if any implementations actually allow defining quaternions or whatnot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Bike @commander-trashdin