Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formalise Theorem 8.8 of RS17 paper #12

Closed
fizruk opened this issue Sep 13, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #114
Closed

Formalise Theorem 8.8 of RS17 paper #12

fizruk opened this issue Sep 13, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #114
Assignees
Labels
RS17 Related to Riehl and Shulman's 2017 paper «Type theory for synthetic ∞-categories»

Comments

@fizruk
Copy link
Member

fizruk commented Sep 13, 2023

This one would particularly benefit from the literate style, providing the category-theoretic version of the proof from the paper in the text.

@fizruk fizruk added the RS17 Related to Riehl and Shulman's 2017 paper «Type theory for synthetic ∞-categories» label Sep 13, 2023
@cesarbm03
Copy link
Collaborator

Feel free to modify the code I added if there is anything clashing with your proof.

@TashiWalde
Copy link
Collaborator

Let me also record here what I told @cesarbm03 .

After formalizing orthogonality and some of the statility properties thereof (see #81 and #76), it will be possible to formalize a very clean proof of this fact.

@TashiWalde TashiWalde mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2023
@TashiWalde
Copy link
Collaborator

@cesarbm03 Do you still plan to add anything to this issue or should we close it? If so, should we keep the helper methods apply-4-3 apply-4-3-again total-inner-horn-restriction map-to-total-inner-horn-restriction-fiber or can they be removed?

@cesarbm03
Copy link
Collaborator

I am not sure if it has any value to have two proofs of the same result too. Plus, your proof is so elegant.
At some point I felt the result was too involved for skills with the computer, I was hoping to resume the proof once I finish with the other PR I have open.
I would vote for closing it since the result is proven now, if I get the "type theoretic proof" then we can decide whether is worth having two methods.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RS17 Related to Riehl and Shulman's 2017 paper «Type theory for synthetic ∞-categories»
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants