You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After formalizing orthogonality and some of the statility properties thereof (see #81 and #76), it will be possible to formalize a very clean proof of this fact.
@cesarbm03 Do you still plan to add anything to this issue or should we close it? If so, should we keep the helper methods apply-4-3apply-4-3-againtotal-inner-horn-restrictionmap-to-total-inner-horn-restriction-fiber or can they be removed?
I am not sure if it has any value to have two proofs of the same result too. Plus, your proof is so elegant.
At some point I felt the result was too involved for skills with the computer, I was hoping to resume the proof once I finish with the other PR I have open.
I would vote for closing it since the result is proven now, if I get the "type theoretic proof" then we can decide whether is worth having two methods.
This one would particularly benefit from the literate style, providing the category-theoretic version of the proof from the paper in the text.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: