Rename PhysToVirt trait to PageTableFrameMapping
#214
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
14 tasks
phil-opp
changed the title
PhysToVirt with new PageTableFrameMapping traitPhysToVirt trait to PageTableFrameMapping
The new trait and method names better describe their purpose. Since the implementer must make sure that the returned pointer is valid and accessible, the trait is now unsafe to implement. Because of this requirement we also need to remove the generic implementation of this trait for closures.
phil-opp
force-pushed
the
rename-phys-to-virt
branch
from
f9c1879 to
f2940dd
Compare
Merged
This was referenced Mar 17, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The new trait and method names better describe their purpose. Since the implementer must make sure that the returned pointer is valid and accessible, the trait is now unsafe to implement. Because of this requirement we also need to remove the generic implementation of this trait for closures.
(See #213 for an alternative, but unsuccessful, attempt).