Remove excess rib while resolving closures #98419
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 9730221 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2022
…ompiler-errors Remove excess rib while resolving closures I've mentioned this on [zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/.60ClosureOrAsyncRibKind.60.20weirdness/near/286982959), in `rustc_resolve`, while resolving closures we add an excess `ClosureOrAsyncRibKind`. It's excess because we later add another one in `visit_fn`. I couldn't find a way in which removing this will break anything, all test seem to pass, etc. r? `@compiler-errors` cc `@davidtwco`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2022
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91264 (Add macro support in jump to definition feature) - rust-lang#96955 (Remove (transitive) reliance on sorting by DefId in pretty-printer) - rust-lang#97633 (Session object: Set OS/ABI) - rust-lang#98039 (Fix `panic` message for `BTreeSet`'s `range` API and document `panic` cases) - rust-lang#98214 (rustc_target: Remove some redundant target properties) - rust-lang#98280 (Improve suggestion for calling fn-like expr on type mismatch) - rust-lang#98394 (Fixup missing renames from `#[main]` to `#[rustc_main]`) - rust-lang#98411 (Update tendril) - rust-lang#98419 (Remove excess rib while resolving closures) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've mentioned this on zulip, in
rustc_resolve, while resolving closures we add an excessClosureOrAsyncRibKind. It's excess because we later add another one invisit_fn.I couldn't find a way in which removing this will break anything, all test seem to pass, etc.
r? @compiler-errors
cc @davidtwco