Rollup of 7 pull requests #94525
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #94525
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Support can be determined by checking for the "d32" LLVM feature.
Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing the output to be *worse*. This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
Add `rustc_middle::ty::suggest_constraining_type_params` that suggests adding multiple constraints. `suggest_constraining_type_param` now just forwards params to this new function.
Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this commit we also suggest adding bounds when a type - Can be copy - All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type params i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest anything for `Option<String>`. Future work: it would be nice to also suggest adding `.clone()` calls
Modify the tier 3 non-ARM targets to show the standard library will no longer build for these and there is no work being done to change that.
Do not point at whole file missing `fn main` Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing the output to be *worse*. This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
Ensure stability directives are checked in all cases Split off rust-lang#93017 Stability and deprecation were not checked in all cases, for instance if a type error happened. This PR moves the check earlier in the pipeline to ensure the errors are emitted in all cases. r? ```@lcnr```
ARM: Only allow using d16-d31 with asm! when supported by the target Support can be determined by checking for the "d32" LLVM feature. r? ````@nagisa````
…ebank
Adt copy suggestions
Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this PR we also suggest adding bounds when a type
- Can be copy
- All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type params
i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest anything for `Option<String>`.
An example:
```rust
fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
(t, t)
}
```
New error (current compiler doesn't provide `help`:):
```text
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `t`
--> t.rs:2:9
|
1 | fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
| - move occurs because `t` has type `Option<T>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
2 | (t, t)
| - ^ value used here after move
| |
| value moved here
|
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
1 | fn duplicate<T: Copy>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
| ++++++
```
Fixes rust-lang#93623
r? ````@estebank````
````@rustbot```` label +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics +C-enhancement
----
I'm not at all sure if this is the right implementation for this kind of suggestion, but it seems to work :')
…henkov Improve allowness of the unexpected_cfgs lint This pull-request improve the allowness (`#[allow(...)]`) of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint. Before this PR only crate level `#![allow(unexpected_cfgs)]` worked, now with this PR it also work when put around `cfg!` or if it is in a upper level. Making it work ~for the attributes `cfg`, `cfg_attr`, ...~ for the same level is awkward as the current code is design to give "Some parent node that is close to this macro call" (cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_expand/base/struct.ExpansionData.html) meaning that allow on the same line as an attribute won't work. I'm note even sure if this would be possible. Found while working on rust-lang#94298. r? `````@petrochenkov`````
Documentation was missed when demoting Windows XP to no_std only After a quick discussion on rust-lang#81250 which removed special casing for mutexes added [here](rust-lang@10b103a) to support Windows XP, we can't say that the standard library can build for it. This change modifies the tier 3 non-ARM targets to show the standard library will no longer build for these and there is no work being done to change that.
Miri/CTFE: properly treat overflow in (signed) division/rem as UB To my surprise, it looks like LLVM treats overflow of signed div/rem as UB. From what I can tell, MIR `Div`/`Rem` directly lowers to the corresponding LLVM operation, so to make that correct we also have to consider these overflows UB in the CTFE/Miri interpreter engine. r? ```@oli-obk```
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
|
📌 Commit 9b88b69 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 9b88b69 with merge bfba26cddc128cdd27522b6c84e230d72f48bb6e... |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
fn main#93142 (Do not point at whole file missingfn main)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup