-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[beta] backports #82996
[beta] backports #82996
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit ee0e841)
Fixes rust-lang#82156 (cherry picked from commit 9889e44)
It is possible for different tests to collide to the same TestDesc when macros are involved. That is a bug, but it didn’t cause a panic until rust-lang#81367. For now, change the code to ignore this problem. Fixes rust-lang#81852. Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 1605af0)
…ss crates It should be never break another crate to re-export a public item. Note that this doesn't check the feature gate at *all* for other crates: - Feature-gates aren't currently serialized, so the only way to check the gate is with ad-hoc attribute checking. - Checking the feature gate twice (once when documenting the original crate and one when documenting the current crate) seems not great. This should still catch using the feature most of the time though, since people tend to document their own crates. (cherry picked from commit fdb32e9)
(cherry picked from commit 3be69b1)
Fix rust-lang#82455. (cherry picked from commit 5ad6088)
This submodule update reverts <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81803>. While that change is meant to fix a real bug, [LLVM PR42623], it caused new permission errors on Windows 7 that make it unable to build any archives. This is probably the same root cause as [LLVM PR48378]. Fixes rust-lang#81051. We'll file a new Rust issue to track the LLVM resolution. [LLVM PR42623]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42623 [LLVM PR48378]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48378 (cherry picked from commit 31814c4)
Some changes occurred in intra-doc-links. cc @jyn514 |
|
Thanks! If you could drop the beta-accepted label from each PR and update the milestone to 1.51 either once this lands or now (either is fine) that'd be great. @bors r+ rollup=never p=1 |
📌 Commit ee71761 has been approved by |
I thought we kept |
Er, yes, that's correct, sorry. |
OK, they're updated now! |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This backports some beta-accepted PRs and one additional LLVM fix for s390x.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum