-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix commit detected when using download-rustc
#82740
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
On reflection on the issue in rust-lang#79540 (comment), I think the bug was actually using the `compiler/` filter, not using `--author=bors`. rust-lang@9a1d617 has no CI artifacts because it was merged as part of a rollup: ``` $ curl -I https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/96e843ce6ae42e0aa519ba45e148269de347fd84/rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz HTTP/2 404 ``` So 9a1d617 is the correct commit to download, and that's what `--author=bors` does: $ git log --author=bors 4aec8a5 commit 9a1d617 Ideally it would look for "the most recent bors commit not followed by a change to `compiler/`", which would exclude things like documentation changes and avoid redownloading more than necessary, but - Redownloading isn't the end of the world, - That metric is hard to implement, and - Documentation-only or library-only changes are very rare anyway since they're usually rolled up with changes to the compiler.
jyn514
added
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
A-contributor-roadblock
Area: Makes things more difficult for new contributors to rust itself
labels
Mar 4, 2021
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 4, 2021
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit a705a58 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 4, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Seems spurious? @GuillaumeGomez do you recognize this error? |
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2021
…acrum Fix commit detected when using `download-rustc` On reflection on the issue in rust-lang#79540 (comment), I think the bug was actually using the `compiler/` filter, not using `--author=bors`. rust-lang@9a1d617 has no CI artifacts because it was merged as part of a rollup: ``` $ curl -I https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/96e843ce6ae42e0aa519ba45e148269de347fd84/rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz HTTP/2 404 ``` So 9a1d617 is the correct commit to download, and that's what `--author=bors` does: $ git log --author=bors 4aec8a5 commit 9a1d617 Ideally it would look for "the most recent bors commit not followed by a change to `compiler/`", which would exclude things like documentation changes and avoid redownloading more than necessary, but - Redownloading isn't the end of the world, - That metric is hard to implement, and - Documentation-only or library-only changes are very rare anyway since they're usually rolled up with changes to the compiler. Helps with rust-lang#81930. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
That's definitely spurious. @bors: retry |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80527 (Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in) - rust-lang#82310 (Load rustdoc's JS search index on-demand.) - rust-lang#82315 (Improve page load performance in rustdoc) - rust-lang#82564 (Revert `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` impl to prevent pointers invalidation) - rust-lang#82697 (Fix stabilization version of move_ref_pattern) - rust-lang#82717 (Account for macros when suggesting adding lifetime) - rust-lang#82740 (Fix commit detected when using `download-rustc`) - rust-lang#82744 (Pass `CrateNum` by value instead of by reference) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
13 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-contributor-roadblock
Area: Makes things more difficult for new contributors to rust itself
A-download-rustc
Area: The `rust.download-rustc` build option.
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On reflection on the issue in #79540 (comment), I think the bug was actually using the
compiler/
filter, not using--author=bors
. 9a1d617 has no CI artifacts because it was merged as part of a rollup:So 9a1d617 is the correct commit to download, and that's what
--author=bors
does:$ git log --author=bors 4aec8a5
commit 9a1d617
Ideally it would look for "the most recent bors commit not followed by a change to
compiler/
", which would exclude things like documentation changes and avoid redownloading more than necessary, butHelps with #81930.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum