sys: use process::abort() instead of arch::wasm32::unreachable()
#81530
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rationale:
- `abort()` lowers to `wasm32::unreachable()` anyway.
- `abort()` isn't `unsafe`.
- `abort()` matches the comment better.
- `abort()` avoids confusion by future readers (e.g.
rust-lang#81527): the naming of wasm's
`unreachable' instruction is a bit unfortunate because it is not
related to the `unreachable()` intrinsic (intended to trigger UB).
Codegen is likely to be different since `unreachable()` is `inline`
while `abort()` is `cold`. Since it doesn't look like we are expecting
here to trigger this case, the latter seems better anyway.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit c7f4154 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jackh726
added a commit
to jackh726/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2021
…32-unreachable, r=Mark-Simulacrum sys: use `process::abort()` instead of `arch::wasm32::unreachable()` Rationale: - `abort()` lowers to `wasm32::unreachable()` anyway. - `abort()` isn't `unsafe`. - `abort()` matches the comment better. - `abort()` avoids confusion by future readers (e.g. rust-lang#81527): the naming of wasm's `unreachable` instruction is a bit unfortunate because it is not related to the `unreachable()` intrinsic (intended to trigger UB). Codegen is likely to be different since `unreachable()` is `inline` while `abort()` is `cold`. Since it doesn't look like we are expecting here to trigger this case, the latter seems better anyway.
This was referenced Feb 2, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2021
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80593 (Upgrade Chalk) - rust-lang#81260 (Add .editorconfig) - rust-lang#81455 (Add AArch64 big-endian and ILP32 targets) - rust-lang#81517 (Remove remnants of the santizer runtime crates from bootstrap) - rust-lang#81530 (sys: use `process::abort()` instead of `arch::wasm32::unreachable()`) - rust-lang#81544 (Add better diagnostic for unbounded Abst. Const) - rust-lang#81588 (Add doc aliases for "delete") - rust-lang#81603 (rustbuild: Don't build compiler twice for error-index-generator.) - rust-lang#81634 (Add long explanation e0521) - rust-lang#81636 (Directly use `Option<&[T]>` instead of converting from `Option<&Vec<T>>` later on) - rust-lang#81647 (Fix bug with assert!() calling the wrong edition of panic!().) - rust-lang#81655 (Improve wording of suggestion about accessing field) - rust-lang#81665 (Fix out of date `Scalar` documentation) - rust-lang#81671 (Add more associated type tests) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale:
abort()lowers towasm32::unreachable()anyway.abort()isn'tunsafe.abort()matches the comment better.abort()avoids confusion by future readers (e.g. sys: use Option's unwrap_unchecked() #81527): the naming of wasm'sunreachableinstruction is a bit unfortunate because it is not related to theunreachable()intrinsic (intended to trigger UB).Codegen is likely to be different since
unreachable()isinlinewhileabort()iscold. Since it doesn't look like we are expecting here to trigger this case, the latter seems better anyway.