Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Presort restrictions to make output consistent #74965

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2020

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

The const test part is already adjusted so this should fix #74886.
r? @estebank

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 31, 2020
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2020

📌 Commit 1629fed has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 31, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 1629fed with merge e614f66...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure
Approved by: estebank
Pushing e614f66 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 31, 2020
@bors bors merged commit e614f66 into rust-lang:master Jul 31, 2020
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the sort-params branch July 31, 2020 13:03
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

some ui tests print traits differently on big-endian
5 participants