Actually publish miri in the manifest #58990
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors: r+ |
|
📌 Commit e5b3ed8 has been approved by |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 500, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2019
Actually publish miri in the manifest
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2019
Actually publish miri in the manifest
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2019
Actually publish miri in the manifest
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2019
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #58518 (Use early unwraps instead of bubbling up errors just to unwrap in the end) - #58626 (rustdoc: add option to calculate "documentation coverage") - #58629 (rust-lldb: fix crash when printing empty string) - #58660 (MaybeUninit: add read_initialized, add examples) - #58670 (fixes #52482) - #58676 (look for python2 symlinks before bootstrap python) - #58679 (Refactor passes and pass execution to be more parallel) - #58750 (Make `Unique::as_ptr`, `NonNull::dangling` and `NonNull::cast` const) - #58762 (Mention `unwind(aborts)` in diagnostics for `#[unwind]`) - #58924 (Add as_slice() to slice::IterMut and vec::Drain) - #58990 (Actually publish miri in the manifest) - #59018 (std: Delete a by-definition spuriously failing test) - #59045 (Expose new_sub_parser_from_file) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2019
…alexcrichton Refactor tools/build-mainfest I saw some duplication in rust-lang#58990 and got an itch... Will likely need to be rebased when that lands. Hopefully the PR should have zero semantic changes... r? @alexcrichton
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2019
…alexcrichton Refactor tools/build-mainfest I saw some duplication in rust-lang#58990 and got an itch... Will likely need to be rebased when that lands. Hopefully the PR should have zero semantic changes... r? @alexcrichton
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2019
Refactor tools/build-mainfest I saw some duplication in #58990 and got an itch... Will likely need to be rebased when that lands. Hopefully the PR should have zero semantic changes... r? @alexcrichton
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.