Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use slice::fill in io::Repeat implementation #136967

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

DaniPopes
Copy link
Contributor

Use the existing fill methods on slices instead of manually writing the fill loop.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 13, 2025

r? @tgross35

rustbot has assigned @tgross35.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Member

@joboet joboet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great idea! Just one nit, then r=me

}

// SAFETY: No uninit bytes are being written.
crate::mem::MaybeUninit::fill(unsafe { buf.as_mut() }, self.byte);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not a big fan of long paths... could you use MaybeUninit instead?

@joboet joboet assigned joboet and unassigned tgross35 Feb 13, 2025
Use the existing `fill` methods on slices instead of manually
writing the fill loop.
@joboet
Copy link
Member

joboet commented Feb 13, 2025

Thank you!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 13, 2025

📌 Commit 1a3efd2 has been approved by joboet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 13, 2025
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Use `slice::fill` in `io::Repeat` implementation

Use the existing `fill` methods on slices instead of manually writing the fill loop.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135439 (Make `-O` mean `OptLevel::Aggressive`)
 - rust-lang#136460 (Simplify `rustc_span` `analyze_source_file`)
 - rust-lang#136642 (Put the alloc unit tests in a separate alloctests package)
 - rust-lang#136904 (add `IntoBounds` trait)
 - rust-lang#136908 ([AIX] expect `EINVAL` for `pthread_mutex_destroy`)
 - rust-lang#136924 (Add profiling of bootstrap commands using Chrome events)
 - rust-lang#136951 (Use the right binder for rebinding `PolyTraitRef`)
 - rust-lang#136956 (add vendor directory to .gitignore)
 - rust-lang#136967 (Use `slice::fill` in `io::Repeat` implementation)
 - rust-lang#136976 (alloc boxed: docs: use MaybeUninit::write instead of as_mut_ptr)
 - rust-lang#136981 (ci: switch loongarch jobs to free runners)
 - rust-lang#136992 (Update backtrace)
 - rust-lang#136993 ([cg_llvm] Remove dead error message)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Use `slice::fill` in `io::Repeat` implementation

Use the existing `fill` methods on slices instead of manually writing the fill loop.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135778 (account for `c_enum_min_bits` in `multiple-reprs` UI test)
 - rust-lang#136052 (Correct comment for FreeBSD and DragonFly BSD in unix/thread)
 - rust-lang#136886 (Remove the common prelude module)
 - rust-lang#136938 (Remove `:` from `stack-protector-heuristics-effect.rs` Filecheck Pattern)
 - rust-lang#136956 (add vendor directory to .gitignore)
 - rust-lang#136958 (Fix presentation of purely "additive" replacement suggestion parts)
 - rust-lang#136967 (Use `slice::fill` in `io::Repeat` implementation)
 - rust-lang#136976 (alloc boxed: docs: use MaybeUninit::write instead of as_mut_ptr)
 - rust-lang#137007 (Emit MIR for each bit with on `dont_reset_cast_kind_without_updating_operand`)
 - rust-lang#137008 (Move code into `rustc_mir_transform`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135778 (account for `c_enum_min_bits` in `multiple-reprs` UI test)
 - rust-lang#136052 (Correct comment for FreeBSD and DragonFly BSD in unix/thread)
 - rust-lang#136886 (Remove the common prelude module)
 - rust-lang#136956 (add vendor directory to .gitignore)
 - rust-lang#136958 (Fix presentation of purely "additive" replacement suggestion parts)
 - rust-lang#136967 (Use `slice::fill` in `io::Repeat` implementation)
 - rust-lang#136976 (alloc boxed: docs: use MaybeUninit::write instead of as_mut_ptr)
 - rust-lang#137007 (Emit MIR for each bit with on `dont_reset_cast_kind_without_updating_operand`)
 - rust-lang#137008 (Move code into `rustc_mir_transform`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b5fce2a into rust-lang:master Feb 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Feb 14, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#136967 - DaniPopes:io-repeat-fill, r=joboet

Use `slice::fill` in `io::Repeat` implementation

Use the existing `fill` methods on slices instead of manually writing the fill loop.
@DaniPopes DaniPopes deleted the io-repeat-fill branch February 14, 2025 20:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants