Rollup of 5 pull requests #131012
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #131012
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
…ci-llvm-true, r=Mark-Simulacrum check if it's rust-lang/rust CI job in `llvm::is_ci_llvm_modified` Changes `llvm::is_ci_llvm_modified` to only work on rust-lang/rust managed CI.
…ark-Simulacrum resolve rust-lang#130122: reword 'sort-by' edge-conditions documentation See rust-lang#130122 for rationale & preliminary discussion.
…cs, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: add doc comment to DocVisitor
…=Mark-Simulacrum Clarifications for set_nonblocking methods Closes rust-lang#129903. The issue mentions that `send`, `recv` and other operations are interpreted by some users as methods of `TcpSocket` which led to confusion since it hasn't them. To fix it I added "system" into the documentation as being more precise for two reasons: * it's makes it clear that these names are system operations; * it doesn't point to the location of these methods like `libc` because not every system is POSIX compatible.
…ouxu extend comment in global_llvm_features regarding target-cpu=native Based on the description in rust-lang#83084 by `@nagisa` -- seems better to have this in the code, where it is easier to find.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 329e7b4d4e In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (2da3cb9): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -1.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 3.7%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 768.829s -> 768.779s (-0.01%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
llvm::is_ci_llvm_modified#130383 (check if it's rust-lang/rust CI job inllvm::is_ci_llvm_modified)sort_by(and related methods) is potentially self-contradictory #130122: reword 'sort-by' edge-conditions documentation)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup