-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Centralize live loans maintenance to fix scope differences due to liveness #118175
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
b5b0002
to
3328432
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
3328432
to
1666165
Compare
…=matthewjasper Refactor NLL constraint generation and most of polonius fact generation As discussed in rust-lang#118175, NLL "constraint generation" is only about liveness, but currently also contains legacy polonius fact generation. The latter is quite messy, and this PR cleans this up to prepare for its future removal: - splits polonius fact generation out of NLL constraint generation - merges NLL constraint generation to its more natural place, liveness - extracts all of the polonius fact generation from NLLs apart from MIR typeck (as fact generation is somewhat in a single place there already, but should be cleaned up) into its own explicit module, with a single entry point instead of many. There should be no behavior changes, and tests seem to behave the same as master: without polonius, with legacy polonius, with the in-tree polonius. I've split everything into smaller logical commits for easier review, as it required quite a bit of code to be split and moved around, but it should all be trivial changes. r? `@matthewjasper`
for consistency with how they're named everywhere else
Liveness data is pushed from multiple parts of NLL. Instead of changing the call sites to maintain live loans, move the latter to `LivenessValues` where this liveness data is pushed to, and maintain live loans there. This fixes the differences in polonius scopes on some CFGs where a variable was dead in tracing but as a MIR terminator its regions were marked live from "constraint generation"
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
@bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (bd3a221): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 672.846s -> 672.083s (-0.11%) |
As found in the recent polonius crater run, NLLs and the location-insensitive polonius computed different scopes on some specific CFG shapes, e.g. the following.
I had missed that liveness data was pushed from different sources than just the liveness computation: there are a few places that do this -- and some of them may be unneeded or at the very least untested, as no tests changed when I tried removing some of them.
Here,
_6
is e.g. dead on entry tobb2[0]
duringliveness::trace
, but its regions will be marked as live later during "constraint generation" (which I plan to refactor away and put in the liveness module soon). This should cause the inflowing loans to be marked live, but they were only computed inliveness::trace
.Therefore, this PR moves live loan maintenance to
LivenessValues
, so that the various places pushing liveness data will all also update live loans at the same time -- except for promoteds which I don't believe need them, and their liveness handling is already interesting/peculiar.All the regressions I saw in the initial crater run were related to this kind of shapes, and this change did fix all of them on the next run.
r? @matthewjasper
(This will conflict with #117880 but whichever lands first is fine by me, the end goal is the same for both)