Get rid of subst-relate incompleteness in new solver #113901
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
lcnr
reviewed
Jul 21, 2023
| @@ -81,9 +83,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> { | |||
| // As this is incomplete, we must not do so during coherence. | |||
| match self.solver_mode() { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this comment is wrong, please also link to rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#25
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
only-bidi-norm
branch
from
1217199 to
480f414
Compare
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
only-bidi-norm
branch
from
480f414 to
e320112
Compare
|
@bors r=lcnr rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#112508 (Tweak spans for self arg, fix borrow suggestion for signature mismatch) - rust-lang#113901 (Get rid of subst-relate incompleteness in new solver) - rust-lang#113948 (Fix rustc-args passing issue in bootstrap) - rust-lang#113950 (Remove Scope::Elision from bound-vars resolution.) - rust-lang#113957 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#113941 - naive layout isn't refined) - rust-lang#113959 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We shouldn't need subst-relate if we have bidirectional-normalizes-to in the new solver.
The only potential issue may happen if we have an unconstrained projection like
<Wrapper<?0> as Trait>::Assoc == <Wrapper<T> as Trait>::Assocwhere they both normalize to something that doesn't mention any substs, which would possibly prefer?0 = Tif we fall back to subst-relate. But I'd prefer if we remove incompleteness until we can determine some case where we need them, and the bidirectional-normalizes-to seems better to have in general.I can update rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#26 and rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#25 once this lands.
r? @lcnr