-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove the old ValidAlign
name
#104308
Remove the old ValidAlign
name
#104308
Conversation
Since it looks like there won't be any reverts needed in `Layout`, finish off this change.
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
Seems good to me! @bors r+ |
Remove the old `ValidAlign` name Since it looks like there won't be any reverts needed in `Layout` for rust-lang#101899 (comment), finish off this change that I'd left out of rust-lang#102072. r? `@thomcc` cc tracking issue rust-lang#102070
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104110 (prevent uninitialized access in black_box for zero-sized-types) - rust-lang#104117 (Mark `trait_upcasting` feature no longer incomplete.) - rust-lang#104144 (Suggest removing unnecessary `.` to use a floating point literal) - rust-lang#104250 (Migrate no result page link color to CSS variables) - rust-lang#104261 (More accurately report error when formal and expected signature types differ) - rust-lang#104263 (Add a reference to ilog2 in leading_zeros integer docs) - rust-lang#104308 (Remove the old `ValidAlign` name) - rust-lang#104319 (Fix non clickable source link) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Since it looks like there won't be any reverts needed in
Layout
for #101899 (comment), finish off this change that I'd left out of #102072.r? @thomcc
cc tracking issue #102070