Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make docs formulation more consistent for NonZero{int} #101190

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2022
Merged

Make docs formulation more consistent for NonZero{int} #101190

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2022

Conversation

yjhn
Copy link
Contributor

@yjhn yjhn commented Aug 30, 2022

Use third person, as it is used for other std documentation.

Use third person, as it is used for other std documentation.
@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 30, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 30, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 1, 2022

📌 Commit de6a3ec has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 1, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2022
Make docs formulation more consistent for NonZero{int}

Use third person, as it is used for other `std` documentation.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2022
Make docs formulation more consistent for NonZero{int}

Use third person, as it is used for other `std` documentation.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#94467 (Add `special_module_name` lint)
 - rust-lang#100852 (Use `getuid` to check instead of `USER` env var in rustbuild)
 - rust-lang#101072 (bootstrap: Add llvm-has-rust-patches target option)
 - rust-lang#101190 (Make docs formulation more consistent for NonZero{int})
 - rust-lang#101245 (Remove unneeded where whitespace)
 - rust-lang#101251 (Fix  bad target name in Walkthrough)
 - rust-lang#101254 (rustdoc: remove unused `.docblock .impl-items` CSS)
 - rust-lang#101256 (Fixes/adjustments to Fuchsia doc walkthrough)
 - rust-lang#101270 (Update outdated comment about output capturing in print_to.)
 - rust-lang#101271 (Fix filename of armv4t-none-eabi.md)
 - rust-lang#101274 (Fix typo in comment)
 - rust-lang#101279 (Fix doc_auto_cfg for impl blocks in different modules with different `cfg`)
 - rust-lang#101285 (Do not suggest adding `move` to closure when `move` is already used)
 - rust-lang#101292 (rustdoc: remove unneeded CSS `.content table td:first-child > a`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 36d0506 into rust-lang:master Sep 2, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants