Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking Issue for for-loops in constants #87575

Open
jonas-schievink opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 9 comments
Open

Tracking Issue for for-loops in constants #87575

jonas-schievink opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 9 comments
Labels
A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC

Comments

@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

jonas-schievink commented Jul 29, 2021 •
edited by RalfJung
Loading

This tracks #![feature(const_for)], added in #87237.

This feature depends on const_trait_impl and is not currently usable.
@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink added A-const-fn C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC labels Jul 29, 2021
@SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a tracking issue for const range iterators? Doing something like for i in 0..1000 { doesn't compile... am I missing something?

@CalinZBaenen

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@mati865

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@CalinZBaenen

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@mati865

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@CalinZBaenen

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@vacuus vacuus mentioned this issue Dec 14, 2022
Closed
@jvff jvff mentioned this issue Aug 2, 2023
Merged
14 tasks
@giladchase giladchase mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2023
Merged
@Tom1380

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@leftmostcat leftmostcat mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2024
Merged
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile mentioned this issue Apr 15, 2024
Closed
@oggy-dfin oggy-dfin mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2024
Merged
@Crypto-Spartan
Copy link

Any updates on this?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Aug 15, 2024

const_traits is still very unstable. @fee1-dead is doing the refactoring on this and has recently landed a major milestone. There are still many things to resolve though.

Consider sponsoring (https://github.com/sponsors/fee1-dead) as a thank you if this work is important to you

@RalfJung RalfJung mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2024
Closed
8 tasks
@RalfJung RalfJung added A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) and removed A-const-fn labels Dec 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
8 participants
@RalfJung @oli-obk @mati865 @jonas-schievink @SUPERCILEX @Tom1380 @Crypto-Spartan @CalinZBaenen