Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move automation off mac minis, onto macstadium #19286

Closed
brson opened this issue Nov 24, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Move automation off mac minis, onto macstadium #19286

brson opened this issue Nov 24, 2014 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
P-high High priority

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Nov 24, 2014

Physical hardware sucks.

@edunham
Copy link
Member

edunham commented May 28, 2015

I talked with the Servo team today and they're currently using Macstadium for their OSX CI. This means it's definitely possible, though I've yet to investigate pricing and Buildbot integration.

@edunham
Copy link
Member

edunham commented May 29, 2015

Related to #17269

@edunham
Copy link
Member

edunham commented Jun 12, 2015

There are also a few alternatives to macstadium. I've taken some notes on https://ethersheet.org/s/osx-cloud-hosting . Choosing the best one for our needs will require assessing the utilization of the current macs, which is on my list of things that can wait until after Whistler.

@edunham
Copy link
Member

edunham commented Aug 12, 2015

Update: We have the budget for this. Macstadium can only invoice Moz if we have over 10 minis, which we'd be close to between Rust and Servo. Otherwise, we can keep using credit cards then expensing it per-project.

I talked to several people from various companies at MacITConf last month, and confirmed my impression that Macstadium is the closest to AWS for OSX that we can currently get.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jun 23, 2016

This is done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P-high High priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants