You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm hoping to use crater to regression test pre-releases of core libraries, specifically at the moment the embedded-hal crate which underpins the entire embedded ecosystem (and thus causes us some release-time anxiety).
The documentation suggests arbitrary experiments can be run over subsets of discovered crates, but, I can't seem to find any further information about how to achieve that (and it is non-obvious from the CLI help).
I think the process I'm looking for would be to pull all crates that depend on embedded-hal, execute a build and test cycle to create a baseline, then patch to a pre-release version and re-run the tests to observe any difference in failures.
I figured before digging into the code too far it was worth asking:
is this something crater can / should be able to do?
is there existing documentation / are there examples of existing uses of crater for this?
is this something that could be documented / could examples be provided?
are there features we would need to implement to support this use?
Cheers,
Ryan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi all,
I'm hoping to use crater to regression test pre-releases of core libraries, specifically at the moment the embedded-hal crate which underpins the entire embedded ecosystem (and thus causes us some release-time anxiety).
The documentation suggests arbitrary experiments can be run over subsets of discovered crates, but, I can't seem to find any further information about how to achieve that (and it is non-obvious from the CLI help).
I think the process I'm looking for would be to pull all crates that depend on
embedded-hal
, execute a build and test cycle to create a baseline, then patch to a pre-release version and re-run the tests to observe any difference in failures.I figured before digging into the code too far it was worth asking:
Cheers,
Ryan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: