You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it intentional for the C++ headers to include comments, but not the C headers? It makes sense that the copies of the C headers in ffi/diplomat/cpp are just an implementation detail of the C++ headers, but the same argument doesn't seem to hold for ffi/diplomat/c.
Note: @gregtatum added C++ docs generation in #85. The primary documentation is intended to be the *.rst files, but perhaps we should put the docs into the *.h files as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, this would be really nice for in-editor hints. There was no particularly reason for not doing C headers, other than it was more work that just doing C++ headers.
From @dminor in unicode-org/icu4x#1269 (comment):
Note: @gregtatum added C++ docs generation in #85. The primary documentation is intended to be the
*.rst
files, but perhaps we should put the docs into the*.h
files as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: